Ideas. Stories. Community.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Colorado Capitol coverage is produced by the Capitol News Alliance, a collaboration between KUNC News, Colorado Public Radio, Rocky Mountain PBS, and The Colorado Sun, and shared with Rocky Mountain Community Radio and other news organizations across the state. Funding for the Alliance is provided in part by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

Federal Court Dismisses Tina Peters Appeal, Says State Case Must Proceed First

Scott Crabtree/The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel via AP, Pool, File Tina Peters, former Mesa County, Colo., clerk, listens during a court hearing on March 3, 2023, in Grand Junction, Colo.
Scott Crabtree/The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel via AP, Pool, File
Tina Peters, former Mesa County, Colo., clerk, listens during a court hearing on March 3, 2023, in Grand Junction, Colo.

Tina Peters’ fight against her 2024 conviction must first play out in state courts, before a federal court can even consider that she be released on bail, a federal magistrate ruled Monday.

The former Republican Mesa County clerk, Peters, is serving a nine-year sentence in a state women’s prison in Pueblo on charges relating to allowing unauthorized access to Mesa County’s Dominion voting machines while she was serving as the county clerk. She asked a federal court to release her on bond, arguing that errors at the state court level meant she should be released while she appeals her state conviction.

Peters said the state court failed to consider the federal records preservation act, the supremacy clause, and also violated the First Amendment when the state judge said she could not be released on bond because she was a danger to the community.

But in a 12-page ruling, federal court Magistrate Judge Scott Varholak said state proceedings must play out before a federal court can consider the request.

“Because Ms. Peters’ appeal remains pending in state court, where she argues that the trial court violated her First Amendment rights by punishing her based upon her speech, any First Amendment error can be corrected through the state appeal,” Varholak said.

The judge said Peters’ attorneys failed to make the case that her case warranted federal intervention ahead of allowing the state case to be resolved. Such exceptions are rare. Still, Varholak did note Peter's First Amendment argument “raises important Constitutional questions.”

“Without question, Ms. Peters raises important Constitutional questions concerning whether the trial court improperly punished her more severely because of her protected First Amendment speech,” Varholak wrote.

Bente Birkeland has been reporting on state legislative issues for KUNC and Rocky Mountain Community Radio since 2006. Originally, from Minnesota, Bente likes to hike and ski in her spare time. She keeps track of state politics throughout the year but is especially busy during the annual legislative session from January through early May.
Tom Hesse
Related Content